What do you mean by non approved? If the mRNA vaccines aren't approved for children, then you don't need to argue that point. You aren't being forced to make a choice about a vaccine that isn't approved for children.

Pfizer and Moderna were given full approval by Health Canada Sept, 2021. Full approval means that pfizer and moderna have been added to the routine vaccine schedule. Why do you say that a vaccine which has been granted full approval by Health Canada is non-approved???

Here's the problem: Every anti vaxxer I've encountered demands to be shown the irrefutable scientific proof of vaccine safety. But, when I do provide the science, not a single anti vaxxer has EVER been willing to look at the science. They only seem to care about winning an argument using whatever means necessary, but I haven't encountered a single anti vaxxer that is willing to risk having their views about vaccines challenged by looking at the true science. Basically, every anti vaxxer I've ever encountered likes to demand proof but they are unwilling to be the least bit open minded in having their vaccine beliefs challenged.

What kind of person are you? One who demands credible, scientific proof but won't ever look at it, when it is presented? Are you a person who's completely unwilling to have your fear of vaccines challenged? A person who would rather live in ignorance, ignoring the proof you're demanding?

Is your mind already made up with no room for change? Or, are you genuinely seeking to know the TRUTH about vaccine safety, and willing to study the true science that you're demanding, even if it means challenging your current beliefs about vaccines? Are you seeking to find an answer about vaccine safety or are you simply seeking confirmation of what you already believe, regardless of whether or not it's accurate?

If your mind is already made up about vaccine safety and you're demanding science that you have zero intention of looking at, then I'm not gonna waste time on you.